From the comments earlier this week...
Donna IS telling the truth when she says she had questions about bags and "notified someone". She notified lots of someones. Just not anyone in charge. Not mods. Just other members via emails or PMs in hateful, harsh, mocking words. She wasn't concerned about getting fakes off tPF. She was morbidly concerned and obsessed with the possessions of COMPLETE STRANGERS to the point of trying to rabble rouse among Hermes sub forum members. I know. I saw some of these PMs. They were promptly reported them to the Hermes sub forum mods. And they reprimanded her, but it still took overt and open harassment of melliesmom to finally ban that psycho. TPF tried very hard not to ban Donna, even though tons of members despised her for her mean, patronizing, nasty comments.
13 comments:
Totally agree. I have seen Donna in action, and you describe exactly what she was doing. She harassed many members who had large collections via PM, and tried to get other members to join her in bashing members who had bags she thought were iffy.
Plus she had two user IDs on the purse forum, and used both of them.
What business is it of yours, Donna of the other tpfers' bags? On what authority?
PFA is now a joke. It's reduced to name-calling and comments that seem to have no meaning at all. Mr Tonello now seems to allow comments critical of him, but then replies to them in a very childish tone ("nyah, nyah, you're a nitwit, nyah, nyah" kind of replies). Quite a silly little man, really.
What is quite remarkable about D's responses is that she seems more fixated on defending her actions on PFA & tPF than she is disturbed by her husband & child's information being outed here. And she does nothing to defend her favourite author either.
@11:34am - that's all TPFA has ever been. Of course, that means it's time for a post about Japster and Grand Fonds again.
People follow the chronology of events - date and time stamps. Michael Tonello never ever allowed comments about himself nor Donna Lehtonen in the past. By allowing comments about himself on his vicious blog is in direct response to what he reads here. You are so guilty, Michael Tonello. You have tormented too many people over too long, and your victims won't let you continue making them miserable. Laws will catch up to put nasty people like you away.
The more you write, the more evidence for a compelling case.
Fixation on Japster and Grands Fonds ... Further proves a point that you're Michael Tonello.
I agree with the person who wrote about Donna's responses. And also agree with the fact that she is not saying a single word to defend all those accusations leveled against her friend, the author! Maybe because she knows all of the things he's been doing on the internet, the stalking, the harassing and the bullying? All she can think of now is saving her own skin!
Donna used 2 user IDs to do what? To talk to herself, to fake that she has a supporter in agreement or to double her harassmnent efforts?
From another blog (EF): duchess's post
Posted: Monday, April 11, 2011 11:27:29 AM
"wow, I really don't know what to say, except that I would like this person to copy and paste any cyber bully posts attributed to me. I have never posted any personal information on any person on the internet, and I don't condone bullying. I have made personal observations regarding members of TPF but they have never been bullying or hate mongering. I have questioned the authenticity of various members bags, and/or motives; but I don't consider this cyber bullying, and I only referred to their member ID, and never their real names.
The things that certain people are writing about me, are not only hurtful and untrue, they are also slanderous; which IS chargeable."
More lies from the duchess of h.
How about it's more hurtful for those that you targeted.
It's not fun to be on the receiving end, is it duchess?
Donna Lehtonen is a text book example of a narcissist. She does not care about anyone but herself. Not Michael Tonnello, not her husband, or her child. She's a reckless and selfish excuse of a human being.
"Donna used 2 user IDs to do what? To talk to herself, to fake that she has a supporter in agreement or to double her harassmnent efforts?"
She didn't talk to herself, that's more the type of thing MT did in those days (2008) though I think Donna's now jumped on that bandwagon. She did use them to double her harassment efforts, because PMs coming from two different people talking about someone's "fake bag" (as authenticated by Donna) would carry more weight.
Anything authenticated by Donna carries no weight. She owns only a few Hermes bags not a real collector. She just tells tales about others, jealous of everyone. Sick!!!!
Post a Comment